I believe in many ways, that plagiarism should be a subject that should be attended to at the secondary and college levels. The idea of plagiarism has hounded us since grade school. We are told by no means should we steal another's thoughts or ideas, yet do not have the tools at hand to properly credit original ideas. In viewing Dr. Stange's data, it is apparent that some aspects of correct citing are readily understood, however, others evade even college students.
We are given distinct ways to write a paper...MLA, APA, Chicago Citation...yet, still do not know beyond a shadow of a doubt how to properly give credence to someone else's work. I believe that plagiarism represents a very "gray area" in academia; not so much on the part of the administration or even the professors, but more along the lines of student comprehension. If there were a definite, written, reliable means for reference via the University, the confusion would be considerably lessened.
I agree Leslie that by defining plagiarism a lot of the confusion about the topic would be alleviated. But not just defining it in the small print on page 257 of a student handbook; it also needs to be addressed by the professor at the beginning of the semester.
ReplyDeleteMy sentiments exactly. Also an in-depth step-by-step list (especially for secondary students) on how to precisely lend credence to someone else's thoughts would be helpful.
ReplyDeleteI think it is necessary to address plagiarism as simply as possible to protect students in academia:for quotations: Use quotation marks and citations. For ideas; use citations. The rest are details.
ReplyDeleteFor copyright issues; money wins. Always give credit. Do not undermine ability of other to protect )and increase) assets. When in doubt, call a lawyer.
I cannot agree with you more. Money always seems to win. I'm all for bartering chickens. Well, then chickens would always win.
ReplyDelete